Doris Kearns Goodwin on Hillary Losing: “Nothing to do with her being a woman.”
From an article by Jodi Kantor in yesterday’s New York Times, “Gender Issue Lives On as Clinton’s Hopes Dim”…
“When people look at the arc of the campaign, it will be seen that being a woman, in the end, was not a detriment and if anything it was a help to her,” the presidential historian Doris Kearns Goodwin said in an interview. Mrs. Clinton’s campaign is faltering, she added, because of “strategic, tactical things that have nothing to do with her being a woman.”
1 comment
IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH HER BEING A WOMAN?? MAYBE SO…..BUT IT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH THIS:
n February, the Center for Responsive Politics reported that Sen. Obama’s political action committee had given $694,000 to superdelegates in the previous three years. Of the 81 who had announced their support for Obama at the time, 34 had received donations totaling $228,000.
HOW’S THAT FOR “CHANGE”??
HOW’S THAT FOR “FIXING THE SAME OLD BROKEN POLITICS IN WASHINGTON”??
OBAMA’S TRANSPARENCY IS OFFENSIVELY OBVIOUS. WHICH IS WHY I’M BAFFLED AS TO WHY SO MANY AMERICANS HAVEN’T FIGURED HIM OUT YET. THE ONLY THING I CAN COME UP WITH IS THAT MAYBE THEY INGESTED TOO MANY LEAD PAINT CHIPS AS CHILDREN, OR JUST FLAT-OUT DON’T GIVE A DAMN. SADLY, I THINK IT’S PROBABLY THE SECOND REASON.
Leave a Comment