<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for RedPhoneDiaries.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redphonediaries.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redphonediaries.com</link>
	<description>Politics, Business, Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on VP Hillary? Not! Reason #2: Obama Can Win Women&#8217;s Vote Without Her by Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.redphonediaries.com/2008/06/09/vp-hillary-not-reason-2-obama-can-win-womens-vote-without-her/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redphonediaries.com/?p=80#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Senator Obama doesn't need Hillary Clinton on the ticket.  There are plenty of other strong VP picks that bring positives with fewer negatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator Obama doesn&#8217;t need Hillary Clinton on the ticket.  There are plenty of other strong VP picks that bring positives with fewer negatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VP Hillary? Not! Reason #1: Obama Would Need a Food Taster (Gergen) by Anderson Cooper Celebrity Gossip &#124; VP Hillary? Not! Reason #1: Obama Would Need a Food Taster (Gergen)</title>
		<link>http://www.redphonediaries.com/2008/05/28/vp-hillary-not-reason-1-obama-would-need-a-food-taster-gergen/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson Cooper Celebrity Gossip &#124; VP Hillary? Not! Reason #1: Obama Would Need a Food Taster (Gergen)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 08:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redphonediaries.com/?p=72#comment-47</guid>
		<description>[...] This will be the first of many posts on the subject of why Barack Obama should not ask Hillary Clinton to join his ticket as the Democratic Party’s Vice-Presidential candidate. Reason Number 1 was articulated in an offhand witticism by the usually serious David Gergen, appearing on CNN on the evenin &#8230; Source: VP Hillary? Not! Reason #1: Obama Would Need a Food Taster (Gergen) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] This will be the first of many posts on the subject of why Barack Obama should not ask Hillary Clinton to join his ticket as the Democratic Party’s Vice-Presidential candidate. Reason Number 1 was articulated in an offhand witticism by the usually serious David Gergen, appearing on CNN on the evenin &#8230; Source: VP Hillary? Not! Reason #1: Obama Would Need a Food Taster (Gergen) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VP Hillary? Not! Reason #1: Obama Would Need a Food Taster (Gergen) by Jamie Holts</title>
		<link>http://www.redphonediaries.com/2008/05/28/vp-hillary-not-reason-1-obama-would-need-a-food-taster-gergen/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Holts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 15:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redphonediaries.com/?p=72#comment-46</guid>
		<description>I found your site on Google and read a few of your other entires.  Nice Stuff.  I'm looking forward to reading more from you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found your site on Google and read a few of your other entires.  Nice Stuff.  I&#8217;m looking forward to reading more from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VP Hillary? Not! Reason #1: Obama Would Need a Food Taster (Gergen) by Jamie Holts</title>
		<link>http://www.redphonediaries.com/2008/05/28/vp-hillary-not-reason-1-obama-would-need-a-food-taster-gergen/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Holts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 14:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redphonediaries.com/?p=72#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Hello.

I like your site and wanted to know if you would be interested in exchanging blogroll links.

Thanks in advance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello.</p>
<p>I like your site and wanted to know if you would be interested in exchanging blogroll links.</p>
<p>Thanks in advance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VP Hillary? Not! Reason #1: Obama Would Need a Food Taster (Gergen) by Jamie Holts</title>
		<link>http://www.redphonediaries.com/2008/05/28/vp-hillary-not-reason-1-obama-would-need-a-food-taster-gergen/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Holts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 14:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redphonediaries.com/?p=72#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to say HI.  I found your blog a few days ago on Technorati and have been reading it over the past few days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to say HI.  I found your blog a few days ago on Technorati and have been reading it over the past few days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Now Hillary Compares Florida/Michigan to Bloody Election in Zimbabwe by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.redphonediaries.com/2008/05/25/now-hillary-compares-floridamichigan-to-bloody-election-in-zimbabwe/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 02:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redphonediaries.com/?p=71#comment-43</guid>
		<description>How much cash has Hillary's PAC donated to superdelegates?  Jeff-NYC leaves this "fact" unmentioned...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much cash has Hillary&#8217;s PAC donated to superdelegates?  Jeff-NYC leaves this &#8220;fact&#8221; unmentioned&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Race Now Officially a Factor: Gee, Thanks Hillary! by Jeff-NYC</title>
		<link>http://www.redphonediaries.com/2008/05/13/race-now-officially-a-factor-gee-thanks-hillary/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff-NYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 01:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redphonediaries.com/?p=61#comment-42</guid>
		<description>THAT'S  WEAK!!!!   LET'S PLACE REAL BLAME WHERE REAL BLAME IS DUE......  HILLARY CLINTON IS HARDLY DESERVING OF SUCH ACCUSATORY BLAME.  IF SHE HAS SUCH STRENGTH AND POWER TO DESTRUCT AN ENTIRE POLITICAL PARTY,  THEN I'D SAY SHE'S ONE STRONG BIOTCH AND LOGICALLY IS AND SHOULD BE THE NOMINEE.  YOU CAN'T FORCE-FEED AN AFRICAN AMERICAN CANDIDATE DOWN THE THROATS OF AMERICANS WHILE DISREGARDING AND IGNORING HIS WEAKNESSES/CONTROVERSIAL LIABILITIES. AMERICA WOULD MORE EASILY EMBRACE A   LEGITIMATE, TRUST-WORTHY, HONEST, NON-SHADEY  AFRICAN AMERICAN CANDIDATE, THAT DIDN'T CARRY THIS BAGGAGE WHICH IS WAY TOO RECKLESS FOR ANY CANDIDATE, OF ANY RACE OR GENDER TO HAVE.  NOT TO MENTION,  HE'S A LIAR AND A CHEAT.  "AND ONCE YOU SMOKE CRACK, YOU NEVER GO BACK"

n February, the Center for Responsive Politics reported that Sen. Obama's political action committee had given $694,000 to superdelegates in the previous three years. Of the 81 who had announced their support for Obama at the time, 34 had received donations totaling $228,000.

HOW'S THAT FOR "CHANGE"??

HOW'S THAT FOR "FIXING THE SAME OLD BROKEN POLITICS IN WASHINGTON"??

OBAMA'S TRANSPARENCY IS OFFENSIVELY OBVIOUS. WHICH IS WHY I'M BAFFLED AS TO WHY SO MANY AMERICANS HAVEN'T FIGURED HIM OUT YET. THE ONLY THING I CAN COME UP WITH IS THAT MAYBE THEY INGESTED WAY TOO MANY LEAD PAINT CHIPS AS KIDS, OR JUST DON'T GIVE A DAMN. SADLY, I THINK IT'S PROBABLY THE SECOND REASON. AMERICA HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN SNOWED.  THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN O"B"A M A   &#38;   O"S"A M A   IS  B.S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THAT&#8217;S  WEAK!!!!   LET&#8217;S PLACE REAL BLAME WHERE REAL BLAME IS DUE&#8230;&#8230;  HILLARY CLINTON IS HARDLY DESERVING OF SUCH ACCUSATORY BLAME.  IF SHE HAS SUCH STRENGTH AND POWER TO DESTRUCT AN ENTIRE POLITICAL PARTY,  THEN I&#8217;D SAY SHE&#8217;S ONE STRONG BIOTCH AND LOGICALLY IS AND SHOULD BE THE NOMINEE.  YOU CAN&#8217;T FORCE-FEED AN AFRICAN AMERICAN CANDIDATE DOWN THE THROATS OF AMERICANS WHILE DISREGARDING AND IGNORING HIS WEAKNESSES/CONTROVERSIAL LIABILITIES. AMERICA WOULD MORE EASILY EMBRACE A   LEGITIMATE, TRUST-WORTHY, HONEST, NON-SHADEY  AFRICAN AMERICAN CANDIDATE, THAT DIDN&#8217;T CARRY THIS BAGGAGE WHICH IS WAY TOO RECKLESS FOR ANY CANDIDATE, OF ANY RACE OR GENDER TO HAVE.  NOT TO MENTION,  HE&#8217;S A LIAR AND A CHEAT.  &#8220;AND ONCE YOU SMOKE CRACK, YOU NEVER GO BACK&#8221;</p>
<p>n February, the Center for Responsive Politics reported that Sen. Obama&#8217;s political action committee had given $694,000 to superdelegates in the previous three years. Of the 81 who had announced their support for Obama at the time, 34 had received donations totaling $228,000.</p>
<p>HOW&#8217;S THAT FOR &#8220;CHANGE&#8221;??</p>
<p>HOW&#8217;S THAT FOR &#8220;FIXING THE SAME OLD BROKEN POLITICS IN WASHINGTON&#8221;??</p>
<p>OBAMA&#8217;S TRANSPARENCY IS OFFENSIVELY OBVIOUS. WHICH IS WHY I&#8217;M BAFFLED AS TO WHY SO MANY AMERICANS HAVEN&#8217;T FIGURED HIM OUT YET. THE ONLY THING I CAN COME UP WITH IS THAT MAYBE THEY INGESTED WAY TOO MANY LEAD PAINT CHIPS AS KIDS, OR JUST DON&#8217;T GIVE A DAMN. SADLY, I THINK IT&#8217;S PROBABLY THE SECOND REASON. AMERICA HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN SNOWED.  THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN O&#8221;B&#8221;A M A   &amp;   O&#8221;S&#8221;A M A   IS  B.S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paglia on Hillary: &#8220;She won&#8217;t stop her manic tarantella until the party whirls into ruins.&#8221; by Jeff-NYC</title>
		<link>http://www.redphonediaries.com/2008/05/14/paglia-on-hillary-she-wont-stop-her-manic-tarantella-until-the-party-whirls-into-ruins/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff-NYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 01:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redphonediaries.com/?p=62#comment-41</guid>
		<description>HILLARY CLINTON IS HARDLY THE REASON FOR THE DISTRUCTION THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY WILL ENDURE.  BLAMING IT ON HER IS SPINLESS.  IF SHE HAS  SOOO MUCH POWER THAT SHE CAN DESTROY THE PARTY... IT SEEMS TO ME THAT SHE'S ONE STRONG BIIOTCH AND SHOULD LOGICALLY BE THE NOMINEE..... BUT LET'S PLACE THE BLAME WHERE THE BLAME IS DUE:

n February, the Center for Responsive Politics reported that Sen. Obama's political action committee had given $694,000 to superdelegates in the previous three years. Of the 81 who had announced their support for Obama at the time, 34 had received donations totaling $228,000.

HOW'S THAT FOR "CHANGE"??

HOW'S THAT FOR "FIXING THE SAME OLD BROKEN POLITICS IN WASHINGTON"??

OBAMA'S TRANSPARENCY IS OFFENSIVELY OBVIOUS. WHICH IS WHY I'M BAFFLED AS TO WHY SO MANY AMERICANS HAVEN'T FIGURED HIM OUT YET. THE ONLY THING I CAN COME UP WITH IS THAT MAYBE THEY INGESTED WAY TOO MANY LEAD PAINT CHIPS AS KIDS, OR JUST DON'T GIVE A DAMN....SADLY, I THINK IT'S SAFE TO ASSUME THAT IT'S PROBABLY THE SECOND REASON.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HILLARY CLINTON IS HARDLY THE REASON FOR THE DISTRUCTION THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY WILL ENDURE.  BLAMING IT ON HER IS SPINLESS.  IF SHE HAS  SOOO MUCH POWER THAT SHE CAN DESTROY THE PARTY&#8230; IT SEEMS TO ME THAT SHE&#8217;S ONE STRONG BIIOTCH AND SHOULD LOGICALLY BE THE NOMINEE&#8230;.. BUT LET&#8217;S PLACE THE BLAME WHERE THE BLAME IS DUE:</p>
<p>n February, the Center for Responsive Politics reported that Sen. Obama&#8217;s political action committee had given $694,000 to superdelegates in the previous three years. Of the 81 who had announced their support for Obama at the time, 34 had received donations totaling $228,000.</p>
<p>HOW&#8217;S THAT FOR &#8220;CHANGE&#8221;??</p>
<p>HOW&#8217;S THAT FOR &#8220;FIXING THE SAME OLD BROKEN POLITICS IN WASHINGTON&#8221;??</p>
<p>OBAMA&#8217;S TRANSPARENCY IS OFFENSIVELY OBVIOUS. WHICH IS WHY I&#8217;M BAFFLED AS TO WHY SO MANY AMERICANS HAVEN&#8217;T FIGURED HIM OUT YET. THE ONLY THING I CAN COME UP WITH IS THAT MAYBE THEY INGESTED WAY TOO MANY LEAD PAINT CHIPS AS KIDS, OR JUST DON&#8217;T GIVE A DAMN&#8230;.SADLY, I THINK IT&#8217;S SAFE TO ASSUME THAT IT&#8217;S PROBABLY THE SECOND REASON.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Doris Kearns Goodwin on Hillary Losing: &#8220;Nothing to do with her being a woman.&#8221; by Jeff-NYC</title>
		<link>http://www.redphonediaries.com/2008/05/19/doris-kearns-goodwin-on-hillary-losing-nothing-to-do-with-her-being-a-woman/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff-NYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 01:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redphonediaries.com/?p=66#comment-40</guid>
		<description>IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH HER BEING A WOMAN?? MAYBE SO.....BUT IT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH THIS:

n February, the Center for Responsive Politics reported that Sen. Obama's political action committee had given $694,000 to superdelegates in the previous three years. Of the 81 who had announced their support for Obama at the time, 34 had received donations totaling $228,000.

HOW'S THAT FOR "CHANGE"??

HOW'S THAT FOR "FIXING THE SAME OLD BROKEN POLITICS IN WASHINGTON"??

OBAMA'S TRANSPARENCY IS OFFENSIVELY OBVIOUS. WHICH IS WHY I'M BAFFLED AS TO WHY SO MANY AMERICANS HAVEN'T FIGURED HIM OUT YET. THE ONLY THING I CAN COME UP WITH IS THAT MAYBE THEY INGESTED TOO MANY LEAD PAINT CHIPS AS CHILDREN, OR JUST FLAT-OUT DON'T GIVE A DAMN. SADLY, I THINK IT'S PROBABLY THE SECOND REASON.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH HER BEING A WOMAN?? MAYBE SO&#8230;..BUT IT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH THIS:</p>
<p>n February, the Center for Responsive Politics reported that Sen. Obama&#8217;s political action committee had given $694,000 to superdelegates in the previous three years. Of the 81 who had announced their support for Obama at the time, 34 had received donations totaling $228,000.</p>
<p>HOW&#8217;S THAT FOR &#8220;CHANGE&#8221;??</p>
<p>HOW&#8217;S THAT FOR &#8220;FIXING THE SAME OLD BROKEN POLITICS IN WASHINGTON&#8221;??</p>
<p>OBAMA&#8217;S TRANSPARENCY IS OFFENSIVELY OBVIOUS. WHICH IS WHY I&#8217;M BAFFLED AS TO WHY SO MANY AMERICANS HAVEN&#8217;T FIGURED HIM OUT YET. THE ONLY THING I CAN COME UP WITH IS THAT MAYBE THEY INGESTED TOO MANY LEAD PAINT CHIPS AS CHILDREN, OR JUST FLAT-OUT DON&#8217;T GIVE A DAMN. SADLY, I THINK IT&#8217;S PROBABLY THE SECOND REASON.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Now Hillary Compares Florida/Michigan to Bloody Election in Zimbabwe by Jeff-NYC</title>
		<link>http://www.redphonediaries.com/2008/05/25/now-hillary-compares-floridamichigan-to-bloody-election-in-zimbabwe/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff-NYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 00:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redphonediaries.com/?p=71#comment-39</guid>
		<description>THE SAD THING IS THAT HILLARY CLINTON HAPPENS TO BE COMPLETELY ACCURATE.  APPARENTLY, THE PEOPLE'S VOTES MEAN ABSOLUTELY NOTHING IN A "PAID" ELECTION SUCH AS THIS ONE.  REST ASSURE, THIS MY FRIENDS, WILL NOT STAND IN THE GENERAL ELECTION.

n February, the Center for Responsive Politics reported that Sen. Obama's political action committee had given $694,000 to superdelegates in the previous three years. Of the 81 who had announced their support for Obama at the time, 34 had received donations totaling $228,000.

HOW'S THAT FOR "CHANGE"??

HOW'S THAT FOR "FIXING THE SAME OLD BROKEN POLITICS IN WASHINGTON"??

OBAMA'S TRANSPARENCY IS OFFENSIVELY OBVIOUS. WHICH IS WHY I'M BAFFLED AS TO WHY SO MANY AMERICANS HAVEN'T FIGURED HIM OUT YET. THE ONLY THING I CAN COME UP WITH IS THAT MAYBE THEY INGESTED WAY TOO MANY LEAD PAINT CHIPS AS CHILDREN, OR JUST FLAT-OUT DON'T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT THE DIRECTION THIS COUNTRY HEADS TOWARD....  SADLY, I THINK IT'S PROBABLY THE SECOND REASON.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE SAD THING IS THAT HILLARY CLINTON HAPPENS TO BE COMPLETELY ACCURATE.  APPARENTLY, THE PEOPLE&#8217;S VOTES MEAN ABSOLUTELY NOTHING IN A &#8220;PAID&#8221; ELECTION SUCH AS THIS ONE.  REST ASSURE, THIS MY FRIENDS, WILL NOT STAND IN THE GENERAL ELECTION.</p>
<p>n February, the Center for Responsive Politics reported that Sen. Obama&#8217;s political action committee had given $694,000 to superdelegates in the previous three years. Of the 81 who had announced their support for Obama at the time, 34 had received donations totaling $228,000.</p>
<p>HOW&#8217;S THAT FOR &#8220;CHANGE&#8221;??</p>
<p>HOW&#8217;S THAT FOR &#8220;FIXING THE SAME OLD BROKEN POLITICS IN WASHINGTON&#8221;??</p>
<p>OBAMA&#8217;S TRANSPARENCY IS OFFENSIVELY OBVIOUS. WHICH IS WHY I&#8217;M BAFFLED AS TO WHY SO MANY AMERICANS HAVEN&#8217;T FIGURED HIM OUT YET. THE ONLY THING I CAN COME UP WITH IS THAT MAYBE THEY INGESTED WAY TOO MANY LEAD PAINT CHIPS AS CHILDREN, OR JUST FLAT-OUT DON&#8217;T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT THE DIRECTION THIS COUNTRY HEADS TOWARD&#8230;.  SADLY, I THINK IT&#8217;S PROBABLY THE SECOND REASON.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
